Nine Months to $2,000,

Nine Months to $2,000,

Or: Why Group Practice Ownership Is a Terrible Get-Rich-Quick Scheme

This morning, I opened my computer and saw a reminder that made me laugh.

In June of 2019, I paid myself my first salary from Tri Health Clinic.

It was $2,000.

At the time, I was thrilled.

So thrilled, in fact, that I set the very reminder that went off today to remind future me of this momentous occasion.

Not because $2,000 a month was a lot of money. It wasn’t. But because it meant the idea was working.

What makes this milestone particularly funny is that I opened the clinic in October of 2018.

October. November. December. January. February. March. April. May. June.

Nine months.

Nine months before I paid myself anything.

And when I finally did, it was $2,000.

If you’re reading this as a therapist in private practice, you may already be doing some math and realizing that there were probably easier ways to make money.

You would be correct.

The Parts of Starting a Group Practice That Nobody Sees

One of the funny things about owning a group practice is that people often assume the business owner is making a fortune.

I occasionally hear comments that imply group practice owners simply collect a percentage of everyone else’s work and ride off into the sunset.

The reality is a little less glamorous.

Before there were clinicians, there was rent.

Before there were referrals, there was rent.

Before there was revenue, there was…

…you guessed it…

rent.

Commercial leases are not small commitments. When you sign one, you are taking on years of financial responsibility regardless of whether a single client walks through the door.

Then there are the offices themselves.

Six furnished therapy offices don’t magically appear.

Trust me, I know exactly how eye-watering the IKEA and Structube bills can become.

We grew carefully over time. One office became two. Two became four. Four became six.

Every expansion meant another gamble.

Another lease commitment.

Another room to furnish.

Another financial risk taken before there was any guarantee it would pay off.

And that doesn’t even include websites, marketing, software subscriptions, insurance, professional services, administrative support, training systems, or the countless other expenses required to build a clinic.

Many therapists never have to think about these things.

That’s not a criticism.

It’s actually the point.

The Strange Reality of Early Practice Ownership

There were years when clinicians working at the clinic made significantly more money than I did.

Oddly, I was proud of that.

Because it meant the system was working.

It meant clients were finding us.

It meant therapists were building successful practices.

It meant people were getting help.

It meant that something I had poured time, money, energy, and risk into was starting to become real.

The goal was never to build a clinic where I made the most money.

The goal was to build something that mattered.

Something that could help people.

Something that could outlast me.

What Therapists Often Miss About Fee Splits in Group Practice

Therapists can see the fee split.

What they don’t always see is the decade that came before it.

The years spent building referral relationships.

The years spent networking.

The years spent meeting physicians.

The years spent learning Google Ads.

The years spent writing blogs.

The years spent refining intake systems.

The years spent figuring out which marketing strategies worked and which were simply expensive mistakes.

The years spent creating training systems, supervision structures, and processes.

In other words, therapists see the percentage.

They rarely see the investment.

Today, a therapist can join our clinic and walk into a referral ecosystem that took years to build.

They don’t have to pay for Google Ads, design a website, hire an intake coordinator, build physician relationships from scratch.

They don’t have to spend nine months making nothing.

It’s because someone already spent years building it.

The Therapy Market Has Changed

When I opened Tri Health Clinic, the therapy market looked very different.

I opened my practice shortly before the COVID-19 pandemic hit. This was a time of growing acknowledgement that having a therapist was a sign of strength, not a weakness.

Online therapy was becoming all the rage.

Start up costs were lower and waitlists grew with little to no effort.

When I opened my clinic in Kingston, Ontario, the Psychology Today search results for my town produced 5 pages of results.

Today that same search produces over 100 pages.

in 2026, Ontario has more therapists than ever before.

I see private practitioners who previously had thriving caseloads worrying about where their next referrals will come from.

I see clinic owners trying to sell practices that are no longer financially viable.

I see clinicians wondering whether they can afford to stay in the profession.

The reality is that being an excellent therapist is no longer enough to guarantee a thriving practice.

Marketing matters.

Systems matter.

Referral relationships matter.

Business strategy matters.

The reason Tri Health Clinic continues to grow isn’t luck.

It’s not because we’re smarter than everyone else.

It’s because we have spent years investing in the clinic during periods when the return on that investment was uncertain.

What Success Means to Me Now

When I started the clinic, I probably thought success meant making more money (more than $2000 a month, anyways).

Today, I think success looks very different.

Success is that more than 3,000 individuals and couples have received care through our clinic.

Success is that people have better relationships because of us.

Success is that people have better sex because of us.

Success is that clinicians have built meaningful careers here. Built friendships.

Success is that our clinic is continuing to grow during a period when many practices are struggling.

Success is that what started as an idea is now something that genuinely helps people.

That was the dream all along.

And honestly, I feel like we’re just getting started.

A Note to Therapists Looking for Work

If your dream is to own a practice, wonderful.

We need more thoughtful, self-regulated, ethical practice owners.

The profession benefits from people who are willing to take risks and build something meaningful.

But I also hope you understand what you’re signing up for.

I hope you have realistic expectations.

I hope you appreciate the financial risks involved.

I hope, like I did, that you have support around you while you’re building.

Because practice ownership is not simply therapy with better pay.

It is an entirely different job.

And if your goal is simply to do excellent therapy and help people live better lives, don’t underestimate the value of joining a strong group practice.

Especially in today’s market.

There is tremendous value in walking into a referral system, a support system, a training system, and a community that somebody else spent years building.

After all, somebody has already paid the IKEA bill.

And speaking from experience, that bill is no joke.


If you’re a therapist reading this and thinking, “I’d rather skip the nine months to $2,000 part,” I don’t blame you. If you’re a high-quality therapist looking to advance your skills in sex therapy, or an exceptional couples therapist looking for a strong referral base, supervision, consultation, and a community of like-minded clinicians, take a look at the Tri Health Clinic Careers page. We’d love to hear from you.

The Economics of Group vs Solo Private Practice

The Economics of Group vs Solo Private Practice

What Clinicians Rarely See Behind a Successful Group Practice


Why Give Away Part of My Income to a Group Practice?

Many clinicians considering group practice ask a simple question:

Why share income with a clinic when you could keep 100% in solo practice?

On the surface, the logic seems straightforward.

If a clinician works independently, they keep their full fee. In a group practice, a portion of that fee is shared with the clinic.

The math seems like a no brainer; 100% is better than 60%!

However, this comparison assumes that clinical income exists in isolation from the infrastructure required to generate and sustain it.

In reality, running a stable, ethical, and high-quality clinical practice requires a complex system of operations, risk management, financial planning, and professional infrastructure.

Most clinicians never see this work.

In fact, when a clinic is functioning well, clinicians should not see most of it.

At the Tri Health Clinic, a significant amount of work is happening continuously in the background to ensure clinicians have:

  • stable referral streams
  • predictable income
  • legal and financial protection
  • administrative support
  • high-quality office space
  • ethical pricing structures
  • sustainable workloads
  • protection against burnout
  • community of like-minded professionals

If clinicians are largely unaware of how much work is happening behind the scenes, that usually means the system is functioning as intended.

This article aims to briefly pull back the curtain on that infrastructure and explain how the economics of a well-run group practice actually work.


My Personal Experience in Solo Practice

Before founding the Tri Health Clinic, I operated in solo private practice from 2018 to 2019, and prior to that I was in a pseudo solo practice from 2016.

Running a solo practice provides a clear education in the realities of clinical business operations.

During those years I managed:

  • marketing
  • referrals
  • client inquiries
  • website development
  • billing systems
  • payment collection
  • administrative communication
  • financial tracking
  • tax preparation
  • legal documentation
  • office infrastructure
  • client scheduling
  • cancellation management

Even while operating conservatively and carefully managing expenses, I was unable to reduce operating costs below approximately 30% of gross revenue.

This was a time well before the mental health field was as saturated as it is today. For example, Kingston’s Psychology Today search had about 5 pages of therapists, compared to the almost 600 therapists the same search reveals today.

My operating costs din’t even capture the time spent managing the business itself, which further reduced effective income.

Operating a clinic at scale only increases the complexity, costs, and risk associated with these systems.


Calculating Take-Home in Private Practice

I’m sure that you, like me, have run the mental calculations of running a private practice in your mind. You think “okay, take my hourly rate, multiple by the number of clients I’ll see in a week, and consider how many weeks I want to work in a year”.

Even with a generous amount of vacation, the number these mental exercises produce are usually eye-watering.

Cue excitement! Cue mental shopping lists! Cue visions of retiring in Costa Rica at the age of 41!

However, because we have degrees in human behaviour and not in economics, we forget that that figure represents gross revenue, not income.

Running a practice requires investment in several categories of infrastructure.

These include:

  • office space and utilities
  • administrative systems
  • billing and payment processing
  • legal and accounting services
  • marketing and reputation management
  • technology platforms and EMR systems
  • client intake and communication systems
  • financial compliance and reporting
  • policy development and documentation

Many of these costs require considerable risk.

For example, signing a commercial lease often requires a much longer commitment and more legal nuance than the residential lease most of us are familiar with. This is a considerable liability.

Not to mention the considerable up front expenses associated with an office space.

Even if you plan to work virtually, you will need an ergonomic computer set up to protect your body long into your career (think: standing desk, costly office chair, computer monitor set up). Plus a high quality computer and reliable internet connection so you can do your job with minimal interruption.

In addition, clinicians must account for the opportunity cost of time spent managing non-clinical work.

Each hour spent on administrative work (building strong referral networks, managing inquiries in a timely manner), effectively costs the dollar amount you would be making by seeing a client. That’s just not lost income, it’s an expense.

For many therapists operating independently, the financial difference between solo practice and group practice becomes significantly smaller once these realities are accounted for.


The Administrative Infrastructure Behind a Clinic

One of the largest unseen components of a clinic’s operations is administrative coordination.

At the Tri Health Clinic, administrative work includes:

  • managing inquiries in a timely manner
  • coordinating intake appointments
  • responding to any and all client communication
  • managing scheduling systems
  • processing payments
  • maintaining records
  • implementing policies and procedures

Administrative coordination is handled by trained staff who we all love and who specializes in this work. This allows clinicians to focus their professional time on clinical services rather than administrative logistics.

But consider the risk here, as well. What happens if our admin unexpectedly goes off on leave? As a member of a group practice, this is not your concern! Things will continue to operate as normal in the event of an administrator’s leave, because it is ultiamtely the responsibility of the clinic owner to ensure this happens.

As a clinician in a group practice, you will never need to deal with the horrors and administrative nightmare of finding a last minute administrative replacement.

The scale of administrative work, or even the management of an administrator is often underestimated until clinicians experience it firsthand in solo practice. No, thank you!


Financial Infrastructure and Compliance

Might you get a sense of dread or confusion when hearing words like “taxes”, “Canadian Revenue Agency”, “tax deductions”, or “reconciliation”?

Do you feel confident in your ability to accurately categorize and document every single business-related expense you make, forever?

Operating a clinic requires ongoing, detailed financial management.

This includes:

  • bookkeeping
  • accounting
  • financial reporting
  • tax preparation
  • legal compliance
  • financial decision-making
  • assessing financial health of the business
  • choosing how/when to invest in the business

At the Tri Health Clinic, clinicians receive clean monthly associate summaries that simplify financial reporting and tax preparation.

They also receive T4As at the end of every year, uploaded to the CRA for ease of reporting.

Clinicians receive their payment from the clinic via a protected service (no e-Transfered payments here), to ensure no accidents or losses or fraud.

These systems have been carefully chosen and they all provide protection in the event of regulatory review or tax audit.

Without structured systems, financial documentation can become one of the most stressful aspects of independent practice. And finding the right professionals to manage all of this can be extremely pricey.

As part of a group practice, you can trust that this has all been taken care of for you.

Breathe that sign of relief now.


Payment Systems and Revenue Protection

Policies around payment processing are a good example of the kind of high-level operational decision-making that happens continuously within a well-run group practice.

These are not decisions clinicians should have to spend their time making. The goal is simple: clinicians focus on providing excellent care, while the clinic ensures that the operational systems supporting that care are stable, ethical, and financially sound.

For this reason, the Tri Health Clinic requires that all clients maintain a credit card on file. This policy ensures that payments can be processed promptly after sessions and that clinicians are protected from the administrative burden and financial uncertainty associated with unpaid balances.

Credit card processing fees are substantial. Across the clinic, these fees amount to tens of thousands of dollars per year. However, the clinic deliberately absorbs this cost rather than passing it on to clinicians. We consider these fees a necessary cost of doing business in order to maintain a reliable payment system and protect clinicians’ income.

Some solo practitioners attempt to avoid credit card fees by relying on eTransfers or manual payment arrangements. While this approach may reduce transaction costs, it significantly increases the risk of unpaid sessions. When payments are missed, clinicians often have limited practical recourse and may spend considerable time attempting to recover balances.

Our approach prioritizes reliability and clinician protection. By maintaining structured payment systems and absorbing the processing costs at the clinic level, we ensure that clinicians are paid consistently and are not placed in the position of chasing payments from clients.

As a result of these systems, the clinic maintains exceptionally low bad debt rates (under 1%), which helps ensure that clinicians’ income remains stable and predictable.


Referral Stability and Income Predictability

Income stability is one of the most overlooked benefits of working within an established clinic.

Many solo practitioners experience significant fluctuations in referral volume. Look at any therapist facebook group and you will see countless messages to the effect of “is anyone else noticing fewer referrals?”, or “my Psychology Today page doesn’t seem to be working anymore…?”.

When your full time job is seeing clients and marketing is something that happens off the side of your desk (or not at all), you can expect periods of high demand that may be followed by weeks or months of reduced bookings.

Since it was established in 2018, The Tri Health Clinic has gown into one of Ontario’s recognized centres for sex and couple therapy. This was not passive growth; it was deliberate, curated, and took considerable effort, time, and financial investment. Our reputation was established before the pandemic hit and the market became saturated, and this work continues at all times.

Due to the enormous amount of ongoing effort to market the clinic, we receive a large volume of referrals and carefully distribute them among clinicians based on availability and specialization.

This provides clinicians with a more predictable and stable client flow.

This level of investment of time and finances into building a brand is nearly impossible to do while also prioritizing client-facing time. It just isn’t possible as a solo practitioner.

By joining an established, healthy group practice, clinicians benefit from income stability, and thus a significant reduction in financial stress. This peace of mind allows clinicians to focus on clinical work rather than marketing.


Client Fit, Referral Matching, and Burnout Prevention

Solo practitioners often feel pressure to accept most inquiries in order to maintain income stability.

This can lead clinicians to take on clients outside their preferred clinical areas or outside what might be considered their professional “zone of strength.” Over time, carrying a very broad caseload can increase emotional fatigue and contribute to burnout.

Within a team-based clinic, clinicians have the ability to focus more intentionally on their areas of expertise and interest. When a clinician is not currently accepting certain presentations—for example couples therapy, trauma work, or specific sexual health concerns—those clients can be matched with another clinician within the clinic who is better suited to the work.

This structure benefits both clinicians and clients by increasing the likelihood of a strong therapeutic fit.

For solo practitioners, managing this process can be significantly more complicated.

When an inquiry arrives that falls outside a clinician’s expertise, most therapists do not simply decline the request and move on. Clinicians care deeply about the people who reach out to them. Many will spend time responding thoughtfully, conducting consultation calls, reaching out to colleagues, reviewing referral options, and attempting to identify an appropriate alternative provider.

This work is meaningful, but it also carries a real cost.

It requires time, coordination, and often emotional energy as clinicians attempt to ensure that a client who has reached out for help is not simply turned away without support.

At the Tri Health Clinic, this process is built into the clinic’s intake infrastructure. Our intake coordinator manages referral matching and works carefully to connect clients with clinicians whose expertise aligns with the presenting concern.

When the clinic identifies a gap in services—for example, a type of client we cannot currently accommodate—the responsibility does not fall on individual clinicians to solve that problem. Instead, clinic leadership works to address the gap, often by recruiting additional clinicians with the appropriate specialization.

This approach ensures that clients receive appropriate care while protecting clinicians from the logistical and emotional burden of managing complex referral coordination on their own.

It also strengthens the broader professional community by ensuring that clients are matched thoughtfully with clinicians whose training and interests align with their needs.


Pricing Strategy and Market Research

Another responsibility of clinic leadership is determining appropriate fee structures.

As Independent Contractors, clinicians at our particular clinic ultimately choose their own fees. However, the clinic provides the research, data, and infrastructure needed to select a fee that supports a sustainable and thriving practice.

In solo practice, pricing decisions are often made with limited information. Many clinicians start with a quick scan of Psychology Today to see what colleagues are charging, followed by an internal debate that might sound something like:

“I want to earn a reasonable income, but I don’t want finances to be a barrier to helping people.”

“There’s no way someone would pay that much to see me.”

“This fee seems… fine, I guess…?”

The cost of therapy is a source of real tension for many clinicians in the helping professions. I know this well because I navigated the same dilemma when I ran my own solo practice.

At the Tri Health Clinic, we intentionally remove much of this burden from clinicians. The clinic conducts detailed market research on pricing across multiple Ontario cities and across several health professions. We also monitor market saturation, referral patterns, and demand for specialized services.

This work ensures that clinic fee structures remain:

  • competitive within the broader market
  • ethical and appropriate for the services provided
  • sustainable for both clinicians, the clinic, and the people we serve
  • aligned with specialized training and expertise

The clinic also manages how fees are communicated to clients and handles structured fee adjustments when necessary.

As a result, clinicians are not left wondering whether they are charging too much, too little, or when it might be appropriate to adjust their rates. Those decisions are supported by ongoing research, careful planning, and transparent procedures.

Pricing is not guesswork; it is the result of ongoing analysis, careful planning, and a commitment to ensuring clinicians are compensated appropriately for their expertise.


Monitorying the Professional Landscape is Done For You in a Group Practice

Maintaining a healthy clinic also requires ongoing engagement with the broader professional landscape. In mental health, especially, that is changing at breakneck speed these days.

As Clinic Director, I regularly participate in and collaborate with several networks of group practice owners, which provide ongoing insight into:

  • emerging industry trends
  • regulatory developments
  • ethical considerations in group practice
  • sustainable compensation models

These communities offer a perspective that is simply not available when practicing alone. Solo practitioners may consult with colleagues, but the operational realities of running a clinic—and the decisions required to support multiple clinicians—are quite different from those of individual private practice.

Engaging with other clinic directors allows us to compare models, identify best practices, and ensure that the structure of our clinic remains both ethical and sustainable.

It also raises a practical question: who has the time to do this while running a full solo practice?

Monitoring industry developments, evaluating new technologies, and analyzing operational models is a substantial responsibility in itself. At the Tri Health Clinic, this work is intentionally part of my role.

My background in research also informs how these decisions are made. Changes are not adopted based on trends alone; they are evaluated carefully, often through a combination of available research, operational data, and consultation with other clinic leaders.

For example, consultation calls have become a common expectation across much of the therapy industry. However, the available evidence suggests that at best, they offer limited benefit beyond rewarding salesmanship rather than improving clinical outcomes, and at worst they can cause real damage by delaying client’s therapy start date. Because our clinic operates at scale, we have the ability to thoughtfully reconsider industry norms that may not serve clinicians or clients well.

Another example is the rapid emergence of AI-supported documentation tools. Before adopting any technology, the clinic evaluated multiple options, assessed clinician interest, and reviewed privacy and consent considerations. Ultimately, we selected an electronic medical record system that includes AI-assisted note-taking capabilities and developed appropriate consent procedures. Clinicians are free to choose whether or not to use these tools, but the infrastructure and due diligence have already been completed.

These kinds of evaluations take significant time and careful analysis. In a solo practice, it is often difficult to keep pace with emerging tools and trends while also managing a full clinical caseload.

At the Tri Health Clinic, part of my responsibility is to remain ahead of these developments so clinicians can benefit from thoughtful, evidence-informed decisions without needing to invest their own time in evaluating every new trend or technology.


Rethinking the Meaning of a Fee Split in Group Practice

Fee splits are often misunderstood as arbitrary numbers, or even greed on the part of a practice owner.

In reality, fee splits in group therapy practice must balance a complex set of factors, including:

  • clinic health and sustainability
  • clinician income
  • administrative infrastructure
  • physical office space
  • technology systems
  • clinic branding and marketing
  • legal and financial compliance
  • long-term operational stability

When these factors are ignored, clinics may offer unusually unbalanced fee splits in order to attract clinicians. While appealing at first glance, these models can destabilize a clinic’s finances and eventually force difficult corrections such as sudden fee increases, reductions in services, or even clinic closure.

I would ask some very serious questions about any fee split less than 35/65, or even 60/40.

At the Tri Health Clinic, fee structures are calculated deliberately and conservatively to ensure long-term stability for both clinicians and the clinic.

The purpose of this article is to illuminate what a fee split actually represents.

You are not simply “giving up a portion of your income.” You are protecting yourself from substantial financial risk, from the enormous time costs of running a business, and from the operational burdens that can quickly erode both income and professional (and personal!) wellbeing.

You are also investing in a sustainable practice environment designed to support clinicians over the long term.

Most graduate programs in the helping professions do not teach the realities of running a business. In fact, I don’t know if this is ever taught at the training level. Yet when clinicians operate as Independent Contractors, that is effectively what they are doing: running a small business.

And like most businesses, operating independently can be expensive and risky.

Consider the cost structure of many other industries: retail stores must carry large amounts of inventory, pay staff, manage supply chains, and maintain physical storefronts. Compared to many businesses, private practice is already relatively streamlined.

Group practice takes that a step further.

By sharing infrastructure, administrative systems, and operational responsibilities, clinicians are able to access the benefits of a well-run business without carrying the full burden of building and maintaining it themselves.

In many ways, it is an unusually supportive model: clinicians are able to focus primarily on the work they trained for while the clinic manages the underlying business systems that make that work possible.

At the Tri Health Clinic, this model is intentional. Our goal is to create an environment where clinicians can build sustainable careers, avoid burnout, and focus on meaningful clinical work.

Ultimately, that serves everyone involved: clinicians, the clinic, and the clients we collectively aim to support.

If this article helps illuminate the realities of practice economics for even a few clinicians, then it has served its purpose.

Offering unsustainably high splits may initially attract clinicians but can destabilize a clinic’s finances.

This can eventually force clinics to:

  • raise client fees unexpectedly
  • reduce services
  • close entirely

Tri Health Clinic operates with a deliberate focus on long-term sustainability.

Fee splits are carefully calculated to ensure clinicians can thrive while the clinic remains financially healthy.


So… Group Practice vs Solo Practice?

If much of what you’ve read here feels unfamiliar, that is actually a good sign.

When a clinic is operating well, clinicians should not need to spend their time thinking about payment systems, pricing strategy, administrative infrastructure, legal compliance, market research, or operational risk. Those responsibilities should be handled by the clinic leadership working diligently in the background.

At the Tri Health Clinic, we take that responsibility seriously. A significant amount of work goes into building and maintaining the systems that allow clinicians to focus on what they do best: providing thoughtful, high-quality care to clients.

Our goal is simple. Clinicians should be protected from the complexity of running a clinical business, supported by strong infrastructure, and able to build sustainable, fulfilling careers. When those systems are functioning well, much of that work remains invisible.

And that is exactly how it should be.

Why Over 1,200 Psychology Registrants in Ontario Have Signed a Letter of Non-Confidence

Why Over 1,200 Psychology Registrants in Ontario Have Signed a Letter of Non-Confidence

As of today, over 1,200 registrants of the College of Psychologists and Behaviour Analysts of Ontario (CPBAO) have signed a formal letter expressing non-confidence in the Registrar.

That number alone should give pause.

This is not a small group of disgruntled professionals. This represents a significant portion of the regulated psychology community in Ontario—including clinicians, supervisors, and trainees—coming together around shared concerns about how our profession is currently being governed.

And importantly, this letter is not about politics.

It is about public protection.


What Is This Letter Actually Saying? (In English, Please)

The letter, addressed to the CPBAO Board of Directors, outlines concerns about leadership, transparency, and decision-making processes at the College. 

At its core, the message is simple:

We are concerned that the current leadership is undermining trust in the College—and that this ultimately affects patient care in Ontario.

Here are the key issues raised, in plain language:

1. Lack of transparency

Many registrants feel unclear on how major decisions are being made—especially how feedback from consultations is actually used. 

2. Insufficient consultation with the profession

Changes that have major downstream impacts (training, supervision, scope of practice) have not consistently involved meaningful engagement with the people most affected. 

3. Breakdown in trust and communication

Communication from the College has, at times, been experienced as dismissive or polarizing, rather than collaborative. 

4. A chilling effect on speaking up

Many psychologists report fear of regulatory repercussions if they express concerns or engage in advocacy. 

5. Disruption to training and workforce stability

Uncertainty around training pathways and standards is already affecting students, supervisors, and ultimately the future workforce. 


What Is Being Requested?

The letter is not calling for chaos or shutdown.

It is asking for stabilization and accountability:

  • A transition to new Registrar leadership
  • A temporary pause on major reforms
  • Independent review of consultation data and governance processes
  • Clear, transparent communication moving forward 

The goal is not to stop progress—but to ensure that change is safe, thoughtful, and grounded in expertise.


Why This Matters for the Public

This is not an internal professional disagreement.

Regulatory decisions shape:

  • Who can provide care
  • What training is required
  • How safe and effective that care is

The letter makes this point clearly:

Public protection depends not just on authority—but on trust, transparency, and accountability. 

If those elements are weakened, the system becomes less effective—no matter how well-intentioned the changes may be.


“But Isn’t This About Access to Care?”

Yes—and this is where things get misunderstood.

Everyone agrees:

➡️ Ontario needs better access to mental health care

➡️ Services need to be more affordable and available

Where the concern lies is how we get there.

The current proposals, as outlined in the letter, are seen by many as:

  • Too fast
  • Insufficiently vetted
  • Significantly lowering training standards

The fear is not change.

The fear is unsafe or poorly implemented change.


Why Many Haven’t Signed (And Why That Matters)

One of the most striking parts of this moment is what isn’t visible.

Many psychologists have not signed the letter—not because they disagree, but because they are afraid.

Afraid of:

  • Regulatory scrutiny
  • Complaints
  • Impact on their license

This “chilling effect” is explicitly named in the letter. 

And that should concern all of us.

Because when professionals are afraid to speak openly about risks to care, the system becomes less safe—not more.


Why I Chose to Support This Letter

As psychologists, we are guided by an ethical obligation to:

  • Protect the public
  • Act with integrity
  • Speak up when standards of care may be at risk

Silence, in this context, is not neutral.

If anything, it is exactly when speaking up feels uncomfortable that it becomes most important.

This letter is not about attacking individuals.

It is about ensuring that:

  • Regulation is evidence-based
  • Change is implemented responsibly
  • The public continues to receive high-quality care

We Can Do Better for The People of Ontario

The purpose of this letter is not to slow progress.

It is to protect the future of mental health care in Ontario—and to ensure that increased access does not come at the cost of quality, safety, or trust.

We can—and must—have both.

The CPBAO Wants to Rewrite Psychologist Training in Ontario. The Data Says That’s a Terrible Idea.

The CPBAO Wants to Rewrite Psychologist Training in Ontario. The Data Says That’s a Terrible Idea.

Psychology is at a Critical Moment in Ontario

Let’s start with the uncomfortable truth:

The College of Psychologists and Behaviour Analysts of Ontario (CPBAO) is proposing changes that could fundamentally reshape what it means to be a psychologist in Ontario.

And the data in a recent whitepaper suggests something pretty shocking:

The changes solve none of the real problems they claim to fix — and may actually make things worse.

This post breaks down a new whitepaper analyzing 17 years of psychologist licensing data in Ontario. I’m going to walk through it section by section in plain English — because the original paper is brilliant, but also… very academic.

So let’s translate it into real human language.

The key takeaway?

Ontario already fixed the licensing problems years ago.

Now the CPBAO is trying to undo the fix.


Paula Miceli, Ph.D., C.Psych and Her Whitepaper

Before diving in, it’s worth acknowledging the person behind the analysis.

While many of us in the profession have been reacting to these proposed changes with understandable frustration and alarm, Paula Miceli, Ph.D., C.Psych. did something far more useful: she did the work.

Instead of shouting into the void (a temptation many of us have felt), she methodically analyzed 17 years of regulatory data, carefully tracing the evolution of Ontario’s licensing system and the outcomes of those decisions.

It’s a deeply thoughtful piece of scholarship that reflects exactly what our profession is supposed to represent at its best — intellectual rigor, patience with complexity, and a commitment to evidence before opinion.

In many ways, this paper beautifully embodies the strengths of psychology as a discipline: the ability to slow down, gather the full history, and make sense of complicated systems with clarity and care.

Now, let’s dive in!


What Is the CPBAO Actually Proposing?

In 2025, the CPBAO proposed major changes to how psychologists are licensed in Ontario. 

The biggest changes:

  • Allow master’s-level graduates to register directly as psychologists
  • Reduce required supervised experience from 4 years to 1 year
  • Change the evaluation process for licensing exams

That means people could become autonomous psychologists with dramatically less training than historically required.

Many clinicians immediately raised alarms.

And the public agreed.

During consultation, nearly 90% of respondents opposed the changes. 

In a separate survey of psychology professionals:

Over 90% said the changes could harm care quality or safety 

Despite that?

The CPBAO council publicly discounted this feedback (?!) and decided to move forward anyway.


Step Back: How Psychologist Regulation Actually Evolved

To understand why people are so upset, the whitepaper looked at 17 years of licensing data.

It found that Ontario’s system evolved through three phases.

Phase 1 (2008–2014): Loose Rules

Back then, the system relied heavily on professional judgment.

Regulators decided case-by-case whether someone’s training was good enough.

That sounds reasonable… until you look at the results.

The system produced:

  • Lower approval rates
  • More inconsistent decisions
  • Far more decisions overturned on appeal

In other words:

The system was messy.


Phase 2 (2015–2023): Clear Standards

Then Ontario introduced clear statutory requirements.

Psychologists needed:

  • Accredited doctoral programs
  • Defined supervised hours
  • Standardized exams

And guess what happened?

Everything improved.

According to the data:

  • Approval rates jumped from 77% to 95%
  • Appeals increased — but errors dropped dramatically
  • Decisions were 7× less likely to be overturned on appeal 

Translation:

The clearer rules made the system fairer and more efficient.

More applicants got through.

And the decisions held up legally.


The Big Myth: “Standards Are Blocking Access”

One of the main arguments for lowering standards is that Ontario supposedly has a bottleneck preventing psychologists from entering the workforce.

The data says otherwise.

Under the stricter rules:

  • Applications increased by 48% 
  • Conversion rates increased
  • The system processed more applicants successfully

In other words:

Higher standards didn’t reduce access. They improved it.

So the idea that doctoral training requirements are causing workforce shortages?

The data simply doesn’t support it.


The Real Issue: The Canadian Free Trade Agreement

Here’s where things get interesting.

The real problem isn’t training standards.

It’s the Canadian Free Trade Agreement (CFTA).

CFTA allows professionals licensed in one province to practice in another province.

That sounds good — until you realize something.

Some provinces allow psychologists with master’s degrees.

Ontario traditionally requires doctorates.

So here’s what happens:

Someone can

  1. Train in Ontario
  2. Move to another province with lower standards
  3. Get licensed there
  4. Come back to Ontario and practice as a psychologist

The CPBAO itself acknowledged this phenomenon. 

That creates three major problems.


The Three Inequities Created by CFTA

The whitepaper identifies three structural problems.

1. Scrutiny Inequity

Applications face wildly different review rates depending on where training happened.

Example:

  • Ontario applicants: 8% review rate
  • International applicants: 31% review rate 

That’s not discrimination — it reflects differences in accreditation and training systems.

But it highlights how complicated mobility rules are.


2. Title Confusion

Because of mobility rules, master’s-level psychologists licensed elsewhere can receive the full “Psychologist” title in Ontario.

Even though Ontario historically required a doctorate.

That means the public can’t tell the difference between doctoral-trained and master’s-trained professionals. 

That’s a transparency problem.


3. Two Parallel Licensing Systems

Right now Ontario effectively has two pathways:

Path A

Doctoral training → full scrutiny

Path B

Master’s training → license in another province → fast-track back

This creates what the paper calls “dual registration pathways.” 

And lowering standards inside Ontario doesn’t fix any of that.


A Reminder: This Isn’t About PhD vs Master’s. That’s the Wrong Argument.

A lot of people have framed this debate as “PhD vs Master’s.” That’s actually not the real issue, and focusing on that argument is distracting from the real problem.

The issue is training depth.

Human psychology is one of the most complex systems we deal with in healthcare. It involves diagnosing and treating conditions that can profoundly affect people’s relationships, functioning, and in many cases, their survival.

Right now, under the proposed rules, two people could both call themselves “Psychologist” in Ontario while having dramatically different levels of training.

For example:

Pathway 1 (traditional doctoral training)

  • 2-year master’s degree
  • 4+ years of doctoral training
  • 1-year clinical internship
  • 1 year supervised practice

That’s roughly 7–8 years of clinical training before independent practice.

Under the proposed model, someone could also be called a Psychologist with:

Pathway 2

  • 2-year master’s degree
  • 1 year supervised practice

That’s approximately 3 years of training total.

These are not remotely equivalent levels of preparation.

And the real concern is this:

The public would not be able to tell the difference because both practitioners would be called Psychologists.

Other Provinces Already Solved This Problem

Interestingly, other jurisdictions have already figured out how to manage different levels of training responsibly.

They simply use different titles.

For example:

  • Psychologist for doctoral-level training
  • Psychological Associate (or similar) for master’s-level training

Ontario already does this.

This approach allows:

  • transparency for the public
  • respect for different training pathways
  • compliance with mobility rules

Everyone knows what level of training their provider has.

It’s simple.

The current proposal would remove that clarity.

Instead of different titles for different levels of training, the new system would allow a much wider range of training to sit under the same title.

Why Titles Matter for Public Safety

Healthcare titles exist for one reason:

So the public can understand who is trained to do what.

If the training behind the title varies dramatically but the title stays the same, that transparency disappears.

Imagine going to a physician and not knowing whether they completed:

8+ years of medical training

or

2 years of medical training

Most people would find that unacceptable.

Yet that is essentially the direction this proposal moves toward in psychology.

And the stakes are not abstract.

Psychologists work with:

  • • suicide risk
  • • trauma
  • • severe mental illness
  • • complex diagnostic decisions

When things go wrong in mental health care, the consequences can be devastating. This is exactly why training standards exist in the first place. The goal isn’t professional elitism.

The goal is public protection and transparency.

People deserve to know who is treating them and how they were trained.


I digress:

The Irony: The CPBAO Reform Solves None of These Problems

The proposed reform introduces master’s-level psychologist registration under the same title as PhD-level psychologists.

But it leaves the underlying CFTA dynamics unchanged.

Meaning:

  • Interprovincial fast-tracking still exists
  • Credential confusion still exists
  • Title inequity still exists

The paper concludes that the reform does not actually solve the regulatory problem it claims to address. 


There Are Smarter Solutions

The whitepaper suggests two realistic options.

Option 1

Assign Psychological Associate designation to interprovincial master’s-level applicants.

Option 2

Create a distinct registration certificate for mobility cases.

Both approaches would:

  • Maintain CFTA compliance
  • Preserve Ontario’s doctoral standard
  • Improve public clarity

In other words:

Fix the mobility problem without collapsing professional standards.


The Bottom Line

This whitepaper analyzed 17 years of regulatory data.

The findings are clear.

Ontario’s system works best when it has clear standards and transparent credential distinctions.

Lowering standards doesn’t fix the real policy problem.

It simply blurs professional identity and risks confusing the public about who is trained to do what.

If the goal is public protection and access to care, the data suggests the better path is:

Fix mobility rules.

Preserve training standards.

Improve transparency.

Not dismantle the system that’s already working.


If You Care About Mental Health Care in Ontario

This issue isn’t just about professional turf.

It’s about:

  • public safety
  • transparency in healthcare credentials
  • maintaining trust in regulated professions

And the decisions made in the coming months will determine whether Ontarians can still clearly understand who is trained to provide psychological care.


If This Concerns You, Speak Up Now

Regulatory decisions like this often happen quietly.

But the consequences will affect every person in Ontario seeking mental health care.

The proposed changes would dramatically expand the range of training behind the title “Psychologist” while removing the clear title distinctions that currently help the public understand who is treating them.

If you believe transparency in healthcare training matters — and that the public deserves to know the qualifications of the professionals providing care — now is the time to speak up.

You can contact the Ontario Minister of Health or your local Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP) and ask them to review the evidence before approving these regulatory changes.

Contact information:

Minister of Health – Sylvia Jones

https://www.ola.org/en/members/all/sylvia-jones

Find your local MPP

https://www.ola.org/en/members/current

You can also contact the Ontario Ministry of Health directly:

https://www.ontario.ca/page/ministry-health

Even a short message matters. Policymakers pay attention when constituents raise concerns about healthcare regulation and public safety.

Ontario’s mental health system depends on clear standards, transparency, and public trust.

If those values matter to you, please take a moment to contact your elected representatives today.

Why Solo Practice Can Be Risky in Sex Therapy (And What We’re Doing Differently at the Tri Health Clinic)

Why Solo Practice Can Be Risky in Sex Therapy (And What We’re Doing Differently at the Tri Health Clinic)

If you’re a therapist reading this, this post is for you.

If you’re a client looking for care, it’s also for you.

Sex therapy and couples therapy are not casual endeavours. We work with people at their most vulnerable: shame, trauma, desire discrepancies, erectile concerns, infidelity, identity questions, relationship ruptures. These are complex, emotionally loaded, and deeply personal issues.

In this kind of work, drifting is dangerous.

And yet, it happens more easily than we like to admit.


The Quiet Risk of Solo Practice

Many clinicians begin their careers in rich, collaborative environments.

Graduate school. Internship. Hospital teams. Case conferences. Supervisors who push your thinking. Peers who challenge your blind spots.

Then, slowly, especially in private practice, that structure fades…

You rent an office.

You build a caseload.

You get busy.

You stop consulting as much.

You stop attending as many conferences.

You rely more on what you “know.”

And over time, something subtle can happen: you drift.

Not because you’re careless.

Not because you don’t care.

But because isolation changes practice.

Without regular consultation, it becomes easier to:

  • Rely on anecdote instead of research
  • Default to personal beliefs about sex and relationships
  • Over-identify with certain clients
  • Miss your own blind spots
  • Continue using interventions that newer evidence has refined or replaced

In sex therapy especially, the research evolves quickly. Desire models have changed. Pain treatment has evolved. Couples therapy frameworks are continually refined. Neurobiology, pelvic health, LGBTQ2S+ care, trauma integration, online delivery — it’s all moving.

If you’re not actively staying connected, you fall behind.

And when we fall behind, clients pay the price.


Why Sex and Couples Therapy Demands Collaboration

Sex and couples therapy is uniquely vulnerable to clinician bias.

We are human. We all carry our own sexual histories, cultural narratives, religious influences, attachment patterns, and relationship experiences.

If we’re not actively examining those influences in consultation and supervision, they seep into the room.

And with something as taboo as sex — and as emotionally charged as couples therapy — even subtle bias can cause harm.

Clients need:

  • Rigour
  • Evidence-based frameworks
  • Clear case conceptualization
  • Ongoing peer consultation
  • Clinicians who are accountable to something larger than themselves

This is not the kind of work that should be done in isolation.


What a High-Functioning Group Practice Actually Looks Like

There is a difference between “a few therapists sharing rent” and a true collaborative clinical environment.

At the Tri Health Clinic, consultation is embedded in the core of what we do.

We have:

  • Weekly group supervision and case consultation
  • Structured individual supervision
  • Lunch & Learn clinical trainings
  • Ongoing competency-based evaluation
  • In-house training development
  • Shared resources and research updates

If someone has a difficult session, they do not sit alone with it.

They walk next door.

They message a colleague.

They hop on a zoom call with a trusted coworker.

They bring it to group.

They talk about it over lunch.

The hallway conversations matter.

The “can I run something by you?” moments matter.

The humility of saying, “I’m not sure about this case” matters.

That culture protects clients.


Staying Sharp: Conferences, Research, and Provincial Collaboration

Staying current is not a once-a-year CE requirement. It’s a professional stance.

As the Clinic Director, I attend international conferences such as SSTAR (Society for Sex Therapy and Research) and clinical case conferences where leaders across North America gather to debate, challenge, and refine approaches to complex cases.

These environments are rigorous, sometimes uncomfortable, deeply collaborative discussions about best practice.

Beyond that, I helped create the Ontario Sexual Health Network (OSHN), bringing together professionals from multiple colleges across the province to collaborate and consult across disciplines. Sexual health does not belong to one profession. It requires integration: psychology, medicine, pelvic floor physiotherapy, nursing, social work.

We need systems that keep us connected because no single clinician, no matter how experienced, is immune to blind spots.


Later Career Does Not Mean Immune to Drift

This part is uncomfortable, but important.

Experience is invaluable.

Wisdom matters.

Clinical intuition develops over time.

But clinician longevity does not automatically equal evidence-based practice.

In fact, later-career clinicians are at particular risk of isolation if they step away from formal supervision, case consultation, and structured peer review.

If you have not had your work meaningfully challenged in years, that is not a badge of honour.

It is a vulnerability.

The strongest clinicians I know — at every career stage — are the ones who seek feedback, invite consultation, and remain curious.


Why This Matters for Clients

If you are seeking sex therapy or couples therapy, here are questions worth asking:

  • Does this clinician consult regularly with peers?
  • Are they connected to current research?
  • Do they attend specialized conferences?
  • Do they have structured supervision or case consultation?
  • Are they accountable to a clinical framework beyond their own opinion?

You deserve a therapist who is embedded in a professional community, not operating in isolation.


Why This Matters for Clinicians

If you are a therapist considering your next step, consider what kind of environment will keep you sharp.

Do you want to:

  • Carry every complex case alone?
  • Sit with ethical dilemmas without structured input?
  • Rely only on CE credits to stay current?

Or do you want:

  • A culture of consultation
  • Weekly structured case discussions
  • Ongoing training
  • Collegial hallway conversations
  • Shared intellectual curiosity
  • A clinic that invests in your development

In our supervision framework, accountability, documentation, evaluation, and ethical oversight are not afterthoughts. They are embedded in how we operate. 

Because excellence in sex therapy requires infrastructure.


The Standard We’re Building in Ontario

My goal is not simply to run a group practice; it is to raise the standard of sex and couples therapy delivery in Ontario.

That means:

  • Evidence-based care
  • Data-driven decision making
  • Structured supervision
  • Interdisciplinary collaboration
  • Ongoing professional development
  • Humility in the face of complexity

Sex therapy is too important to be casual.

Couples therapy is too impactful to be intuitive alone.

Clients deserve clinicians who are sharp, connected, and accountable.

And clinicians deserve environments that help them become the best in the field.

If you are a therapist who wants to practice in a culture of collaboration, rigour, and leadership in sexual health, I would love to talk.

Ontario needs more clinicians who refuse to drift.


Ready to Practice in a Clinic That Won’t Let You Drift?

If you’re reading this as a therapist, here’s the bottom line.

You do not need to be an expert in sex therapy to join us.

But you do need to be:

  • An experienced clinician
  • Solid in your foundational skills
  • Comfortable with complexity
  • Humble enough to consult
  • Motivated to add a specialty to an already strong clinical base

Sex therapy can be taught.

Clinical depth, integrity, and intellectual curiosity are harder to build from scratch.

At Tri Health Clinic, we train experienced therapists to develop real expertise in sex and couples therapy within a structured, collaborative, evidence-based environment. You won’t be thrown into the deep end alone. You’ll have consultation, supervision, research integration, and a culture that expects excellence.

If you’re at a stage in your career where you’re ready to specialize — and you want to do it properly — we’re building something worth joining.

Apply to work at Tri Health Clinic.

We’re always open to strong clinicians who want to raise the standard of care in Ontario.